|
Post by sd51555 on Nov 22, 2019 11:42:46 GMT -6
Hey now, don't go DNR'n my poll. For purposes of this, any non-lake land that supports huntable populations of wild game. **Exclude towns, lakes, and crop fields. “ Support huntable populations “. Hmm, maybe we have very few of these lands in Minnesota! Can I hunt bees and butterflies(pollinators?) Our local manager was telling me how great the local WMA was for pheasants as compared to private lands. I guess it varies with the private lands. An irritated quarter section and he might be right. My quarter section with corn foodplots and cover are a different matter. Did I change the discussion yet? Let's try this again: any non-lake land that claims to support huntable populations of wild game according to the DNR. **Exclude towns, lakes, and crop fields.
|
|
|
Post by sd51555 on Dec 16, 2019 13:10:41 GMT -6
What percentage of public lands should be set aside for use by the 88% of people that do not hunt?
|
|
|
Post by Bob on Dec 16, 2019 13:51:28 GMT -6
What percentage of public lands should be set aside for use by the 88% of people that do not hunt? What if they asked for 88%, and equal pay for equal work?
|
|