|
Post by sd51555 on Aug 12, 2020 7:47:01 GMT -6
Chainsaw carving a piece of information. Systemic Bias not systemic racism? Sure. We're far enough down the road, it's entirely possible these people in the media and deep state think they are acting as the hand of God intervening the way they do, knowing full well it's wrong, but it's for their perverse version of the greater good.
|
|
|
Biden
Aug 12, 2020 7:55:29 GMT -6
Post by nhmountains on Aug 12, 2020 7:55:29 GMT -6
Systemic Bias not systemic racism? Sure. We're far enough down the road, it's entirely possible these people in the media and deep state think they are acting as the hand of God intervening the way they do, knowing full well it's wrong, but it's for their perverse version of the greater good. They can turn on a dime if the powers that be tell them to. Look how fast they turned on Epstein and Weinstein. Their issues were known for years but, nothing happened until someone gave the directive. I doubt they’ll ever give favorable press for Trump now but, if he was running as a democrat then he’d be walking on water.
|
|
|
Biden
Aug 12, 2020 11:41:14 GMT -6
Post by Catscratch on Aug 12, 2020 11:41:14 GMT -6
Chainsaw carving a piece of information. Systemic Bias not systemic racism? Same thing; you can't be racist without bias, can't be bias without prejudiced.
|
|
|
Post by nhmountains on Aug 12, 2020 17:16:17 GMT -6
Systemic Bias not systemic racism? Same thing; you can't be racist without bias, can't be bias without prejudiced. Kamala’s relative Hamilton Brown owned 200+ slaves in Jamaica. Is that a conundrum?
|
|
|
Biden
Aug 12, 2020 17:28:09 GMT -6
Post by chummer16 on Aug 12, 2020 17:28:09 GMT -6
Same thing; you can't be racist without bias, can't be bias without prejudiced. Kamala’s relative Hamilton Brown owned 200+ slaves in Jamaica. Is that a conundrum? Please tell me that is true, no way that is true. Who ever vetted her better have another job lined up
|
|
|
Biden
Aug 12, 2020 19:01:04 GMT -6
Post by Freeborn on Aug 12, 2020 19:01:04 GMT -6
Same thing; you can't be racist without bias, can't be bias without prejudiced. Kamala’s relative Hamilton Brown owned 200+ slaves in Jamaica. Is that a conundrum? You will make my year if that is true. Got a link?
|
|
|
Biden
Aug 12, 2020 19:04:51 GMT -6
Foggy likes this
Post by smsmith on Aug 12, 2020 19:04:51 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Foggy on Aug 12, 2020 19:22:13 GMT -6
|
|
|
Biden
Aug 12, 2020 19:23:30 GMT -6
Foggy likes this
Post by nhmountains on Aug 12, 2020 19:23:30 GMT -6
I wouldn’t trust Snopes anymore. Her fsther’s own doctoral bio mentions he’s a descendant of Hamilton Brown He was a slave owner of 200 slaves.
|
|
|
Biden
Aug 12, 2020 19:26:59 GMT -6
Post by nhmountains on Aug 12, 2020 19:26:59 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by smsmith on Aug 12, 2020 19:38:50 GMT -6
I don't trust Snopes or any other source on the interwebs. They're all agenda driven. When Snopes says "unproven" about her ancestors owning slaves that's about as close as you're gonna get to them saying it happened. For them to not come out and say "false" indicates (to me) that there's probably some truth to it, but proving it as fact will take a lot of digging and research. Shouldn't be too hard for a genealogist
|
|
|
Biden
Aug 12, 2020 20:02:54 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Catscratch on Aug 12, 2020 20:02:54 GMT -6
Same thing; you can't be racist without bias, can't be bias without prejudiced. Kamala’s relative Hamilton Brown owned 200+ slaves in Jamaica. Is that a conundrum? It might be a conundrum if 1) you care about something an individual did a couple hundred years ago, 2) you intend to have bias reporting about it. Fact - it will be weaponized by those who want to, and dismissed by those who wish it hadn't happened.
|
|
|
Post by nhmountains on Aug 12, 2020 20:22:11 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by nhmountains on Aug 12, 2020 20:25:46 GMT -6
Kamala’s relative Hamilton Brown owned 200+ slaves in Jamaica. Is that a conundrum? It might be a conundrum if 1) you care about something an individual did a couple hundred years ago, 2) you intend to have bias reporting about it. Fact - it will be weaponized by those who want to, and dismissed by those who wish it hadn't happened. I agree and could care less what her ancestors did but, if this was a Republican you can bet the media wouldn’t let it go. I go back to what she did to Kavanaugh and how she immediately jumped on the Smollett hoax bandwagon. There’s plenty of fodder for Trump’s team to use.
|
|
|
Post by Catscratch on Aug 12, 2020 20:33:31 GMT -6
It might be a conundrum if 1) you care about something an individual did a couple hundred years ago, 2) you intend to have bias reporting about it. Fact - it will be weaponized by those who want to, and dismissed by those who wish it hadn't happened. I agree and could care less what her ancestors did but, if this was a Republican you can bet the media wouldn’t let it go. I go back to what she did to Kavanaugh and how she immediately jumped on the Smollett hoax bandwagon. There’s plenty of fodder for Trump’s team to use. Plenty of fodder, it should be quite the show. She obviously manipulates option 2. Fact- our media likes option 2 also. Even after she get ripped apart it will be reported that she won. People who want her there will quickly forget facts and by into the bias. I... HATE... THE... MEDIA!
|
|