|
|
Post by biglakebass on Sept 8, 2017 14:40:08 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by kl9 on Sept 8, 2017 14:46:30 GMT -6
Completed it. You'd think if there were an abundance of deer things like taking pictures of them wouldn't even be an issue
|
|
|
|
Post by biglakebass on Sept 8, 2017 14:48:19 GMT -6
Fuckin A I had to do a doubletake on that one. HAAAA.
No comment box again. I wanted to ask..... Whats with the questions focusing on deer damage to crops and habitat, etc? Did they forget there are other animals in the woods that impact those resources too?
|
|
|
|
Post by kl9 on Sept 8, 2017 14:50:37 GMT -6
I doubt they forgot... :/
|
|
|
|
Post by Freeborn on Sept 8, 2017 17:41:21 GMT -6
Done. Some of those questions were kind of open ended.
|
|
|
|
Post by batman on Sept 8, 2017 18:37:06 GMT -6
My favorite was the hint that they may just let farmers kill any deer they see.
|
|
|
|
Post by wklman on Sept 8, 2017 19:44:47 GMT -6
Seemed like a shit sandwich which the dnr could use anyway they want. Worded just vague enough to fool the minions into whatever the dnr wants.
|
|
|
|
Post by kl9 on Sept 8, 2017 20:11:36 GMT -6
Gotta answer in extremes. Either hell yes or fuck no. Mostly fuck no to that survey
|
|
|
|
Post by biglakebass on Sept 8, 2017 20:43:54 GMT -6
I was split fuck yea and fuck no. Do I want deer to I can take pics?  fuck no. Should farmers kill every deer if they have corn eaten? fuck no. |
|
|
|
Post by MoBuckChaser on Sept 9, 2017 5:23:51 GMT -6
"Reduce barriers for landowners experiencing agricultural depredation by allowing the removal of a certain number of deer without a permit; the number allowed would be established regionally."
If they allow this, we are fucked in a lot of areas.......
|
|
fuck no.