|
|
Post by sd51555 on Aug 14, 2020 10:04:30 GMT -6
Do you let the people in deeper and risk the devastating effects of people on public lands, or do you keep them locked out to protect the ecosystems?
|
|
|
|
Post by kabic on Aug 14, 2020 10:09:45 GMT -6
Would be good to own a parcel next to that situation.
I think I read once that a lot of that land was gifted to the DNR.
|
|
|
|
Post by Satchmo on Aug 14, 2020 10:43:15 GMT -6
Lots of land locked state & county land behind my property. No one will be accessing it from my side.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandbur on Aug 14, 2020 11:54:41 GMT -6
I support those who own private property and their rights.
I do get upset when they claim land that isn’t their own and have run into that out west.
|
|
|
|
Post by kooch on Aug 14, 2020 13:39:43 GMT -6
There are guys up in the Baudette area that post public land as private. There were posted sections up there that were 100% public. Another camp took an excavator to a low spot in a minimum maintenance road and cut access to thousands of acres of public land. They had a bridge over the creek deep in their property. Buy 40 acres, have private access to 10,000. Pretty nice for them. Pretty shitty for everybody else.
Same camp that blocked the old trail to the State land, ran a generated 12 hours a day, a loud one.
|
|
