|
|
Post by terrifictom on Mar 8, 2017 20:41:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by wiscwhip on Mar 9, 2017 16:22:10 GMT -6
I am not fond of the new "layout" of the metrics. I understand the tried to move things into the 21st century technology wise, but I like the old "paper" versions better than the interactive web thing they have going now. I guess it will just take some getting used to?
|
|
|
|
Post by terrifictom on Mar 9, 2017 17:18:28 GMT -6
I am not fond of the new "layout" of the metrics. I understand the tried to move things into the 21st century technology wise, but I like the old "paper" versions better than the interactive web thing they have going now. I guess it will just take some getting used to? Yea , a guy has to go back and forth. I guess you could print out the stuff for the county that you are looking at. That way you would have all the info in front of you at one time. One thing I noticed that the rate for forestry regeneration in both Langlade and Bayfield County was better when the deer numbers were higher if I was reading their charts right. |
|
|
|
Post by wiscwhip on Mar 9, 2017 20:22:55 GMT -6
I just glanced at those, and found them a bit confusing, I will look again when I get more time to dedicate to it.
|
|
