|
Post by badbrad on Feb 8, 2017 12:53:38 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by smsmith on Feb 8, 2017 12:56:20 GMT -6
Not only inaccurate, some of that could be financially detrimental
|
|
|
Post by badbrad on Feb 8, 2017 13:02:44 GMT -6
Not only inaccurate, some of that could be financially detrimental Basically everything in the thread is wrong. LOL
|
|
|
Post by leexrayshady on Feb 8, 2017 13:23:30 GMT -6
ok Im in the dark what is a mfl
|
|
|
Post by badgerfowl on Feb 8, 2017 13:25:18 GMT -6
Managed forest land I think.
|
|
|
Post by badbrad on Feb 8, 2017 13:29:12 GMT -6
ok Im in the dark what is a mfl
Managed Forest law. In Wisconsin you sign a 25 or 50 year contract with the state. And give them a plan to manage your forest using best management practices. In exchange for healthy forests the state gives you a significant break on your property taxes.
|
|
|
Post by wiscwhip on Feb 8, 2017 13:31:35 GMT -6
It is the WI forest tax program that gives landowners a tax break to let the DNR Forester dictate when they should harvest trees off their properties and for the yearly tax break, you give the state a portion of your harvest money when they tell you to cut it.
|
|
|
Post by MoBuckChaser on Feb 8, 2017 13:31:44 GMT -6
Yoder will straighten them out....
|
|
|
Post by badbrad on Feb 8, 2017 13:33:44 GMT -6
It is the WI forest tax program that gives landowners a tax break to let the DNR Forester dictate when they should harvest trees off their properties and for the yearly tax break, you give the state a portion of your harvest money when they tell you to cut it. That is not true anymore Dale. They got rid of the harvest tax. You now keep 100% of the money when you cut.
|
|
|
Post by badbrad on Feb 8, 2017 13:34:27 GMT -6
Yoder will straighten them out....
From fucking va. LOL
|
|
|
Post by wiscwhip on Feb 8, 2017 13:34:43 GMT -6
When does the state recover the lost tax burden?
|
|
|
Post by badbrad on Feb 8, 2017 13:36:07 GMT -6
When does the state recover the lost tax burden?
Ummmmmmmm. They don't? LOL
If you think about it. They never did in the past either. The harvest tax wasn't enough to make up for the lost taxes. No way and no how. It just helped.
|
|
|
Post by smsmith on Feb 8, 2017 13:38:29 GMT -6
Boy, I don't know. My folks' had a cut done in '11 and the state's cut would have certainly covered a number of years of property taxes. They'd had 2 previous select cuts done and the state got their share then too.
|
|
|
Post by wiscwhip on Feb 8, 2017 13:39:09 GMT -6
Well fuck me dead! That might put me closer to buying a place than I figured then! Buy it, cut it to the fucking ground to pay for it, enroll in MFL Closed and reap the cheap taxes on a clean slate of prime bedding ground in 3 years! HMMMMMMMMM......
|
|
|
Post by wiscwhip on Feb 8, 2017 13:39:47 GMT -6
Boy, I don't know. My folks' had a cut done in '11 and the state's cut would have certainly covered a number of years of property taxes. They'd had 2 previous select cuts done and the state got their share then too. That ^^^ is the impression I have always been under as well!
|
|